Example 1 - Input is a 20Khz Analog Triangular Wave
Here is how the simulated WaveTrace
reproduced wave will look like
(click an image to see it full size)
And here are some statistics and comparison results:
The above graph compares the amount of bytes
generated by WaveTrace and traditional A/D converters.
WaveTrace (shown in blue) produced 100,000 vectors per second -
achieving a perfect wave reproduction as you will see below.
Remember this is a 20Khz constant
wave! It has to place a vector at each peak. At lower frequencies,
however the amount of vectors per second will drop MUCH lower,
relative to the frequency of the input.
Since high frequency content accounts for only around 5% of an audio
sample, we expect a smaller file size than the 44.1Khz A/D would
generate while WaveTrace audio quality beats that of a 192Khz A/D
converter!
Please scroll down for more.
At high frequencies you can notice the problem that is inherited in
all sample based A/D converters; their output is not synchronized with
the original waveform and the sample misses the waveform changes and
peaks.
Even at DVD quality digital to analog conversion, the wave is still
very far from being able to trace the original wave, misses the peaks
and of course, the biggest problem is that it produces a huge file size.